The most important legal issue in Anchoring is Defamation.
Introduction
to Defamation Laws
Constitutional validity of
Section 499 & 500 of Indian Penal Code
Elements of Defamation and its
exception
Introduction
to Defamation Laws
Defamation is oral or written
statement that hurts someone’s reputation. In Bhagwad Gita, “For a Man of
honour Defamation is worse than death”. It is considered as Great Evil.
Reputation is an integral and important part of the dignity of the individual and
Right to reputation is inherent right guaranteed by Article 21 and it is also
called as natural rights. While Rights of freedom of speech and expression
guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a) of Constitution of India is not absolute and has
imposed reasonable restrictions for exercising rights in the interest of the
security of state, friendly relations with foreign states, public order,
decency, morality, contempt of court, defamation. Only Defamation Laws protect
individual’s private interest and reputation.
In India, Defamation can be
viewed as a civil offence as well as criminal offence and may be defined as the
writing, publication and speaking of a false statement which causes injury to
reputation and good name for private interest. The remedy for a civil defamation
is covered under Law of Torts. In civil defamation, a victim can move high
court or subordinate courts for seeking damages in the form of monetary
compensation from accused. Section 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code
provides an opportunity to the victim to file a criminal case for defamation
against the accused. Punishment for the guilty person for criminal defamation
is simple imprisonment which may extend to two years or fine or both. Under the
criminal law, it is bailable, non-cognizable and compoundable offence.
Constitutional validity of
Section 499 & 500 of Indian Penal Code
In some countries, defamation
laws are not criminal laws. Therefore, whether section 499 & 500 of IPC is
constitutionally valid? Recently, the Supreme Court in Subramanian
Swamy v. Union of India upheld constitutional validity of
defamation laws and ruling that they are not in conflict with the right of
speech. Apex court also said that one is bound to tolerate criticism, dissent
and discordance but not expected to tolerate defamatory attack.
Elements of Defamation and its
exception
Defamation statement must be
in a spoken or written or published or visible manner and must be false and
injured directly or indirectly to the reputation of an individual or his family
members or caste and lowers the moral of the victim and statement is
unprivileged statements. Following Statements can’t be considered as defamation
·
Any truth statement made in public interest;
·
Any opinion given by the public in respect of conduct of a public
servant in discharge of his functions, his character appears;
·
Conduct of any person touching any public question;
·
Publication of any proceedings of courts of justice including
any trial of court and judgment.
No comments:
Post a Comment